Dysport vs Botox: 12 Similarities and Differences

Dysport vs Botox: Dysport is only approved for glabellar lines, or the area between the eyebrows. Botox is approved for treating forehead lines and fine lines around the eyes (crow’s feet), in addition to glabellar lines.

What is the difference between Dysport and Botox

Dysport vs Botox are two injectable derivations of botulinum toxin A (a neurotoxin producing temporary muscle paralysis) both primarily used as cosmetic treatments for wrinkles, laugh lines, crow’s feet, or other lines on the face.

Dysport is only approved for glabellar lines, or the area between the eyebrows. Botox is approved for treating forehead lines and fine lines around the eyes (crow’s feet), in addition to glabellar lines.
These injectables also have other medical known to be safe and cause relatively few side effects. However, there are also a few critical differences between them in terms of how they work and what it is like to receive them. Dysport injections may spread more widely and set more faster than their Botox counterparts
Dysport vs Botox: Dysport is only approved for glabellar lines, or the area between the eyebrows. Botox is approved for treating forehead lines and fine lines around the eyes (crow’s feet), in addition to glabellar lines.

Dysport Vs Botox Similarities:

Dysport and Botox at their core share most of their underlying composition and have much in common.
Both have a cosmetic use – helping to resolve wrinkles and laugh lines
– and uses for specific medical issues.
We are able to bring out bring out how similar they are

Botox and Dysport Ingredients:

1 Botox and Dysport have 1 core ingredient Botulinum toxin A. The small amounts of this substance in both forms inhibits the release of certain neurotransmitters (chemical messengers) associated with muscular contraction. As such, Dysport vs Botox injections work to relax muscles, which confers their therapeutic and cosmetic effects.

Botox and Dysport Indications:

2 Dysport vs Botox share many indications. Though there are some differences,  Both are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as cosmetic treatments to temporarily clear away glabellar lines (also called frown lines or 11 lines). These lines appear on the forehead and between the eyes.
Furthermore, in adults, injections of both Dysport and Botox may treat cervical dystonia, a painful neck spasming that causes sudden head movements.

Botox and Dysport Administration:

3 Dysport vs Botox is administered by healthcare professionals with subdermal (beneath the skin) injections. These injections are localized to areas that need treatment, such as the face, for cosmetic reasons or for certain muscular groups. These injections are administered in healthcare settings.

Who Should Administer Dysport and Botox Treatments?

Because Dysport and Botox injections have therapeutic and cosmetic effects, various medical professionals like physicians, physician assistants, dentists, registered nurses (RNs), licensed skin care specialists, or plastic surgeons administer the injections. Qualified providers vary from state to state based on local regulations are qualified to administer them. Qualified providers vary from state to state based on local regulations.

Dysport vs. Botox Differences

Aside Dysport and Botox having a lot in common, there are also a few key differences between them in terms of how they work and what it’s like to receive them.

What Can Botox Injection Do That Dysport Cannot?

4 Dysport vs Botox injections clear away wrinkles between the eyes and on the face; they also share an ability to treat spasticity (muscle stiffness). But Botox has a broader set of indications and can result in more substantial medical problems.
As stated by FDA, Botox can treat crow’s feet, laugh lines, and other types of wrinkles on the face or forehead due to aging, whereas Dysport is only approved for glabellar lines.

Medical Uses of Botox:

Botox injection treats a wide range of medical issues. Such therapeutic indications include:
Severe sweating in the underarms
Blepharospasm (uncontrollable blinking)
Strabismus (misalignment of the eyes) in adolescents and adults over the age of 12
Chronic migraine (recurrent and severe headaches and other symptoms)
Urinary incontinence (unintentional loss of bladder control)
Upper limb spasticity (uncontrollable movements of the arms)

Which Is Cheaper?

Various factors determine how much you pay for Dysport vs Botox. From where to buy botox and who you buy botox online from. Generally, cosmetic procedures, such as removing laugh lines, aren’t covered by insurance, but medical uses may.
The cosmetic or medical professional administering the treatment can also influence the cost. For instance, plastic surgeons may be expensive than registered nurses. Before undergoing treatment, talk to your provider’s office about how much you can expect to pay.
When comparing pricing, the costs of these treatments are per unit or individual shot. Botox injections cost anywhere from $10–$25 per unit.5
In comparison, individual units of Dysport are $4–$8 per unit, but it typically requires three times the amount of units to achieve an effect. Still, the Dysport may be less expensive.

Which Lasts Longer?

Dysport vs Botox results are temporary, with the effects of the botulinum toxin eventually wearing off and requiring additional therapy. Individual cases vary, but Botox tends to last three to four months, with some seeing an effect of up to six or more months.6

How long does Botox last?

 The same is accurate for Dysport, with results expected to last 12–16 weeks.2
However, a critical difference between the two is that Dysport tends to set quicker than Botox. It takes five days to see the full results of Botox, whereas the effects of Dysport are typically seen within two to three days. That said, it may can up to 14 days for complete results for both options.

Is Dysport More Natural Looking?

Dysport and Botox are effective in reducing wrinkles and lines. Because the composition of Dysport includes specific proteins alongside the botulinum toxin A, it can spread further in the face. Some find it to have a more natural-looking appearance.
A study found says 86.5% of people using Dysport for glabellar lines reported complete satisfaction three months following the initial injection. However, people reported comparable results with Botox. In a study of efficacy for crow’s feet for two types of Botox conducted in Japan, 75.8% and 80.8% of subjects reported satisfaction with the treatment at 30 days after treatment.
Both approaches were well tolerated and led to significant improvements in appearance.

Is Dysport More Painful?

Dysport and Botox rely on targeted injections, which cause a pinch but are known to be tolerable. One comparative study noted that Dysport might cause less pain on injection than its counterpart.

Side Effect Comparison

Because Dysport and Botox are injectable treatments and their composition is similar, they have similar side effects. Adverse reactions in both cases are rare and typically reversible, the most common of which are pain, swelling, bleeding, or bruising at the injection site.
In turn, the common side effects of Dysport and Botox are essentially the same and include the following
Fatigue and drowsiness
Headache and neck pain
Muscle spasms and muscle tightness
Dry mouth
Flu-like symptoms, including fever, coughing, sneezing, nasal congestion, and sore throat
In rare cases, these therapies can also cause more serious adverse effects, which warrant medical attention, including the following:
Eyelid swelling
Blurred or doubled vision
Dry eyes or irritation
Irregular heartbeat
Chest pain

Dysport Vs Botox Overall Results

Dysport and Botox are effective cosmetic injections. In a study comparing the efficacy of Dysport injection for glabellar lines to those receiving sham treatment, 52–60% of patients saw significant improvement at 30 days.2 Another study noted a significant reduction in these lines in 82% of subjects three months after the initial injection.8
Botox injection, the more long-standing of the two, also has a consistent track record of efficacy. In a study conducted in Japan in 2017 for crow’s feet, about 68% of participants reported complete or near complete resolution of the issue at 30 days.9
In another study comparing the two treatments for glabellar lines, both were effective. Dysport injection was 90% effective at 30 days versus 65% of Botox.

Is Plastic Surgery Right for Me?:

Plastic surgery procedures, such as facelift surgery (rhytidectomy), can achieve similar results. Plastic surgeons redistribute skin in the face via incisions along the hairline, pulling the skin tighter to create a more youthful appearance. By nature, this approach is more invasive.
Carefully consider the risks and benefits of plastic surgery before undergoing any procedures. Because, unlike Dysport vs Botox, the results are permanent, you must be sure you are getting cosmetic treatment for the right reasons.
Make sure you are undergoing treatment to boost your confidence and fulfill what you want rather than that of your partner or to fit into perceived social standards. A Good candidate for plastic surgery should be:
In overall good health and free of medical issues that can affect healing
Not using tobacco or being willing to quit
Optimistic and realistic about the outcome of the procedure

Dysport Vs Botox Summary

Dysport vs Botox injections are medical procedures commonly used as temporary cosmetic treatments for facial wrinkles and frown lines. They can also be used for limb spasticity, cervical dystonia, and other medical conditions. Both are highly effective, though more shots of Dysport are generally needed to achieve the same effects as less Botox.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »